Qwen3.6 35B A3B qwen3.6-35b-a3b

qwen · qwen hybrid-reasoning efficient

#43 overall #12 agentic

params
36B (A3.3B)
arch
moe
context
256k
license
apache-2.0 open weights
released
Apr 2026
reasoning
yes
downloads/30d
4.0M

# architecture

attn shared · reasoning GQA 16q/2kv router top-8 of 256 expert ×256 expert out ×40 layers ctx 262,144 36B pool · A3.3B/token
layers
40
d_model
2048
heads
16q / 2kv
head dim
256
experts
top-8 of 256
vocab
248320
family
qwen3_5_moe_text

signal path of one layer, generated from the registry's structured fields — dimension lines quote the model's real numbers; an MoE trace forks at the router, a dense trace runs straight through. Geometry fields come from the repo's config.json.

# why ranked

Overall: #43 — score 59.9 ● high — all signals present

signalweightinput (0–100)
aa_intelligence 0.70 59.3
bench_composite 0.30 61.1

benchmark panel evidence:

complete panelscore (0–100)
aa-coding-v160.2
aime-2026-v162.1

Coding: provisional — score 50.0 ● low — a single signal; treat with caution

provisional: too few independent signals for a numbered position — the score is shown, but this model sorts after every ranked model.

signalweightinput (0–100)
aa_coding 0.30 50.0
aider_polyglot 0.30 —
swe_bench_verified 0.40 —

missing signals are dropped and the remaining weights renormalized — never imputed.

Agentic: #12 — score 50.0 ● low — a single signal; treat with caution

signalweightinput (0–100)
swe_bench_verified 0.60 —
swe_rebench 0.40 50.0

missing signals are dropped and the remaining weights renormalized — never imputed.

full methodology

# trend

OGM score · last 106 days
OGM score over 106 days
overall rank (up is better)
Overall rank over 106 days

methodology changed during this history window; score movement across that boundary is not model movement. See methodology v6.

# benchmarks

benchmarkscoresourcedate
AA Coding Index 41.9 Artificial Analysis —
AA Intelligence Index 18.2 Artificial Analysis —
Ai2d 0.9 / 1 LLM Stats —
AIME 2026 0.9 / 1 LLM Stats —
C-eval 0.9 / 1 LLM Stats —
Cc-ocr 0.8 / 1 LLM Stats —
Charxiv-r 0.8 / 1 LLM Stats —
Claw-eval 0.5 / 1 LLM Stats —
SWE-rebench (resolved) 24.7 SWE-rebench —
SWE-rebench (pass@5) 43.2 SWE-rebench —

# where to run

providerquantctx$/M in$/M out$/M cacheprice srctpsuptime✓
Featherless — ——— via hfrouter — —
Sail 256k $0.05$0.40— via litellm — —
Darkbloomfp4 256k $0.05$0.70$0.03 via openrouter — 100.0%
Libertai 256k $0.15$0.50— via litellm — —
AkashMLfp8 256k $0.10$0.90$0.05 via openrouter — 100.0%
DeepInfrafp8 256k $0.10$0.95— deepinfra — 99.1% ✓
Parasailfp8 256k $0.10$0.95$0.05 via openrouter — 100.0%
DekaLLMunknown 256k $0.10$1.00$0.05 via openrouter — 98.2%
Venicefp8 250k $0.10$1.00— venice — 100.0% ✓
AtlasCloudfp8 256k $0.19$1.11— atlascloud — 99.5% ✓
Phalaunknown 256k $0.20$1.27— phala — 99.2% ✓
CoreWeavefp8 256k $0.25$1.25$0.25 via openrouter — 100.0%
Wandb 262k $0.25$1.25— via litellm — —
Novita 256k $0.25$1.49— novita — — ✓
Aihubmix 256k $0.25$1.52— via litellm — —
SiliconFlowfp8 256k $0.24$1.80$0.15 openrouter — 100.0% ✓
Scaleway — $0.28$1.71— via hfrouter 169 —
Alibaba 256k $0.38$2.25— via modelsdev — —

sorted by blended price ((3·input + output) / 4 per 1M) · ✓ = the provider's own catalog confirms the offer · "via …" prices are what the aggregator routing the offer charges, not the provider's own list price

source aliases
aa
qwen3.6-35b-a3b
hf
Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4
openrouter
qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b